In the ever-evolving world of blockchain and digital assets, Music NFTs stand out as a revolutionary way to own, trade, and invest in music. At Skyhitz, we've observed and categorized Music NFTs based on their degree of decentralization: completely decentralized, partially decentralized, and completely centralized. This classification not only provides clarity but also hints at the future direction of Music NFTs. Let's dive deeper into each category and understand the dynamics shaping the future of music investment.Completely DecentralizedCompletely decentralized Music NFTs represent the epitome of leveraging blockchain technology in the music industry. The media files and metadata for these NFTs are stored on decentralized platforms, such as IPFS (InterPlanetary File System) or Arweave, which ensures their permanence, resistance to censorship, and independence from any central authority. This category, though currently small, is anticipated to become immensely valuable in the future. The key to their potential lies in the unrestricted ability to stream media from anywhere, free from the constraints and gatekeeping often imposed by giant corporations or record labels. Moreover, completely decentralized Music NFTs offer the widest reach. Since they are not tethered to any specific platform, they can be found and traded across numerous marketplaces, increasing their visibility and accessibility. This open ecosystem not only democratizes music distribution but also enhances the value of each NFT by ensuring that it can be seamlessly integrated and utilized across a variety of platforms and applications. The inherent features of completely decentralized Music NFTs: universality, permanence, and freedom from central control position them as the most promising assets for the future of music ownership and distribution. By embracing these NFTs, artists and investors alike tap into a future where music is truly global and free from traditional industry constraints, offering an unprecedented level of access and opportunity. Partially DecentralizedPartially decentralized Music NFTs occupy a middle ground, blending elements of blockchain with traditional centralized storage solutions. In this model, either the media files or the metadata are stored on centralized servers. An illustrative example of this approach is platforms like Nifty Gateway, where the media assets are hosted on centralized servers. This arrangement means that the streaming or accessing of these media assets is contingent upon using their specific service, which introduces a level of gatekeeping reminiscent of conventional music streaming platforms like Spotify.This configuration, while offering some advantages of NFTs, such as proof of ownership and the potential for resale, significantly undercuts the ethos of decentralization that underpins the broader cryptocurrency and blockchain movement. The reliance on centralized services for streaming or accessing the media content essentially negates the benefits of a decentralized, open-access blockchain. It brings into question the degree of innovation and freedom from traditional systems that these partially decentralized NFTs offer.The primary critique of this model lies in its similarity to existing music streaming services, where control over access to music remains in the hands of a few, rather than being democratized across a distributed network. The promise of blockchain technology in the music industry is to decentralize control, ensuring artists and fans can connect directly without intermediaries. Partially decentralized Music NFTs, with their reliance on centralized platforms for critical functions, fall short of fully realizing this promise, mirroring the limitations and control mechanisms inherent in traditional music distribution channels.Completely CentralizedCompletely Centralized Music NFTs, where both media and metadata are hosted on centralized servers, represent a significant deviation from the decentralized ethos of blockchain. These NFTs, while facilitating some form of digital ownership, are tightly controlled by centralized entities, which introduces risks and limitations not present in decentralized formats. A prime example of this approach is Royal, a platform co-founded by the artist 3LAU, which allows users to own a share of streaming rights for music tracks.While Royal's model is innovative, offering fans a stake in the streaming revenue of songs, it is also constrained by its reliance on streaming giants and labels. This dependency means that the success and functionality of NFTs issued by Royal are at the mercy of these external platforms and their willingness to collaborate. Moreover, these NFTs are not directly streamable, which can significantly detract from the user experience and reduce fans' interest. The model primarily benefits established artists by providing immediate financial gains in exchange for a fraction of their streaming rights, potentially at the expense of the investor fans.The centralization inherent in Royal's approach poses a stark contrast to the decentralization promised by blockchain technology. Investor fans may find themselves with limited control over the asset and vulnerable to fluctuations in the asset's value dictated by the decisions of streaming platforms and music labels. This scenario highlights a potential misalignment of interests, where the benefits accrue more significantly to artists with existing traction, leaving fans bearing the risks without commensurate control or influence over the investment.This model, while offering immediate benefits to artists and providing a novel avenue for fan engagement, also encapsulates the challenges of completely centralized Music NFTs. It underscores the importance of examining the degree of control, influence, and value distribution associated with these digital assets, prompting a careful consideration of their long-term viability and impact on the music ecosystem.Another poignant example is the keys to Coachella NFTs, which, following the FTX platform's collapse, lost all associated data except for the transactional records on the Solana blockchain. This category starkly highlights the risks of centralized storage, where the disappearance of a platform can lead to the loss of crucial data, undermining the value and utility of the NFTs.The Dynamic FutureLooking ahead, we foresee a trend towards dynamic Music NFTs, aggregating content from various networks and sources into a single stream of income. This innovative approach allows investors to benefit from owning a piece of music, drawing from multiple platforms and potentially increasing the value and resilience of their investment. The dynamic nature of these NFTs paves the way for a more interconnected and versatile market, where music assets can thrive across different ecosystems.As the Music NFT space continues to evolve, the lines between decentralization and centralization may blur, leading to new forms of digital music assets. At Skyhitz, we are excited to be at the forefront of this transformation, embracing the complexity and potential of Music NFTs. Whether completely decentralized, partially so, or not, each category contributes to the broader narrative of music's digital future. As investors and enthusiasts, it's essential to understand these distinctions and the unique value propositions they offer in the world of music investment.